'}}
Touch Starved in a Crowded World: The Quiet Crisis of Modern Couples
Abstract We live closer together than ever before. Cities are dense, connected, electric with movement. Yet many couples report a quiet, aching loneliness—not dramatic conflict, but distance. Not hatred, but numbness. In the modern metropolis, intimacy is not collapsing from lack of love, but from chronic overstimulation, pressure, and divided attention. As gender roles shift, parenting intensifies, and ambition competes for emotional bandwidth, partners often find themselves exhausted rather than connected. This article explores why intimacy feels fragile in urban life and how Gestalt therapy offers a powerful path back to presence, embodiment, and relational aliveness.
'}}
The Weight of Time: Why Divorce Feels Harder as We Grow Older

Divorce, particularly later in life, presents unique emotional and existential challenges, often felt as the loss of a deeply intertwined personal and shared world. As marriages lengthen, the emotional burden of ending a relationship grows, encompassing feelings of identity loss, existential isolation, and the fear of navigating an uncertain future. Drawing on the philosophical insights of existential psychotherapy, this article explores how divorce can trigger profound questions about freedom, responsibility, and the search for meaning. It also highlights the potential for post-traumatic growth, as individuals rebuild their lives with newfound purpose and self-understanding. The article further examines how Existential Therapy and Gestalt Therapy can provide valuable support during this transition. Existential therapy helps individuals confront their fears around freedom, impermanence, and isolation, while Gestalt therapy emphasizes present-moment awareness and the reintegration of the self. Together, these therapeutic approaches guide individuals through the complexities of divorce, fostering personal growth and the creation of a more authentic, meaningful life post-separation.

'}}
Anger, Sadness and Vulnerability: Navigating the Human Emotional Landscape
In this blog I aim to explore the complex interplay between anger and sadness from Gestalt, relational, existential, and literary perspectives, highlighting how these emotions shape human experience, relational dynamics, and ethical awareness. Drawing on clinical practice, literature from Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Woolf, Morrison, Shakespeare, and Italian authors such as Elsa Morante, Calvino, and Moravia, as well as reflections from Primo Levi, Yontef, and Yalom, the essay examines how anger often masks underlying sadness, how societal norms favor the expression of anger over vulnerability, and how both emotions can be integrated therapeutically. Anthropological and evolutionary insights illuminate why anger may be adaptive in contemporary, fast-paced contexts, while sadness remains relationally dependent. The article offers relational Gestalt interventions, illustrating how therapists can create safe spaces for clients to inhabit both emotions, fostering emotional flexibility, resilience, and moral consciousness. Finally, it reflects on the future evolution of emotional expression in socially and politically polarized environments, emphasizing the necessity of attending to vulnerability, relational attunement, and ethical reflection. Literature serves as a guiding model, showing that characters who integrate anger and sadness positively shape relational dynamics and ethical outcomes, providing both inspiration and practical insight for clinical practice. Anger and sadness are often cast as opposites in both social perception and psychological theory: one is outward, forceful, immediate; the other inward, reflective, and vulnerable. Yet a closer examination—through Gestalt therapy, relational psychology, existential thought, literature, and anthropology—reveals that these emotions are not antagonists but interconnected currents within the human experience, each flowing into and shaping the other. Anger frequently emerges as the visible response, while sadness, slower and relationally dependent, is often suppressed. The reasons for this pattern are complex, embedded in both personal histories and social environments. Anger can assert agency, defend boundaries, and signal moral outrage, whereas sadness requires vulnerability, relational attunement, and a witness willing to bear its weight.
'}}
Rethinking Couple’s Intimacy in Contemporary Society
This blog explores the changing contours of intimacy among couples, identifying how societal changes, technology, and personal identity are reshaping what it means to be close to another person in the 21st century—drawing from historical, anthropological, and psychotherapeutic perspectives.
  • 1
  • 2